The options the spellcaster chooses from are broad. The design intent for options like these is that the spellcaster chooses one of them For example, Conjure Minor Elementals offers four options. Other spells of this sort let the spellcaster choose from among several broad options. But, the SAC as quoted above does give a hint as to the intent: Eight beasts of challenge rating 1/4 or lowerĪgain, according to RAW, there is no indication who picks what. Four beasts of challenge rating 1/2 or lower.Two beasts of challenge rating 1 or lower.One beast of challenge rating 2 or lower.The player can only choose the broad option, not the CR or creatureįor conjure animals, the spellcaster has 4 options: There is no indication of how the DM would choose the beast, so that is left entirely up to the DM at your particular table to decide by the designers. So it is clearly intended that the DM is able to pick the monster after the player picks which option they want. The design intent for options like these is that the spellcaster chooses one of them, and then the DM decides what creatures appear that fit the chosen option. For example, Find Familiar gives the caster a list of animals to choose from. Some spells of this sort specify that the spellcaster chooses the creature conjured. However, the Sage Advice Compendium clarifies how the spell was intended to work by the designers: The rules as written does not define who gets to pick what or how. Rules as Intended: the DM chooses the monster
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |